Jupiter Public Water System,town of

Location
Jupiter, Florida
Serves
94,929
Source
Groundwater
Data
2014-2024

Overview

Jupiter Public Water System,town of is a public drinking-water system serving about 94,929 people in Palm Beach County, Florida.

HAA5 (Haloacetic Acids) was detected in this system’s water. EPA states its health effects: may increase the risk of cancer.

TTHM (Total Trihalomethanes) was detected in this system’s water. EPA states its health effects: may increase the risk of cancer; liver, kidney, or central nervous system effects.

When EPA last ran its national survey here it found HAA6Br, HAA9, Strontium, Manganese, and 1 more. Nobody has been required to look for any of them since.

It serves Jupiter, Juno Beach, Juno Ridge, Jupiter Farms, Jupiter Inlet Colony, North Palm Beach, and 2 other communities.

It uses groundwater as its source.

Contaminants Detected

Not detected, or not looked for 100

PFAS · EPA UCMR5 monitoring

These were genuinely sampled, because EPA required it. Of 29 PFAS “forever chemicals” tested under the UCMR5 program, 0 were detected (shown above) and 29 were not:

11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFBA, PFBS, PFDA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpA, PFHpS, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFNA, PFOA, PFOS, PFPeA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFUnA

Regulated contaminants · no result on record

Federally regulated contaminants with no reading on record for this system. A missing reading can mean the sample came back clean, or that nobody was required to take one. The published data does not say which, and smaller systems monitor many of these only once every few years:

1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, 2,4,5-TP (Silvex), 2,4-D, Alachlor, Antimony, Arsenic, Asbestos, Atrazine, Barium, Benzene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Beryllium, Beta particle & photon emitters, Bromate, Cadmium, Carbofuran, Carbon tetrachloride, Chlordane, Chlorite, Chlorobenzene (monochlorobenzene), Chromium (total), Combined radium (Ra-226 & Ra-228), Cyanide, Dalapon, Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate, Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Dibromochloropropane (DBCP), Dichloromethane (methylene chloride), Dinoseb, Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD), Diquat, Endothall, Endrin, Ethylbenzene, Ethylene dibromide (EDB), Fluoride, Glyphosate, Gross alpha particle activity, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, Hexachlorobenzene, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, Lindane, Mercury (inorganic), Methoxychlor, Nickel, Nitrite, Oxamyl (Vydate), Pentachlorophenol, Picloram, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Selenium, Simazine, Styrene, Tetrachloroethylene, Thallium, Toluene, Toxaphene, Trichloroethylene, Uranium, Vinyl chloride, Xylenes (total), cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, o-Dichlorobenzene, p-Dichlorobenzene, trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

What a national survey found, years ago

A utility only reports contaminants that have a federal limit. EPA runs a separate national survey to look for the ones that do not, sampling each system a handful of times and then moving on. These are Jupiter Public Water System,town of’s results from those rounds. They are the only public measurements of these substances for this system, and they are between five and twelve years old.

ContaminantHighest readingFound inMeasured
HAA6Br (brominated haloacetic acids)20.15 ug/L672x the Florida Water Report benchmark of 0.03 ppb8 of 8 samples2018–2019
HAA9 (nine haloacetic acids)20.62 ug/L687x the Florida Water Report benchmark of 0.03 ppb8 of 8 samples2018–2019
Strontium334 ug/LEPA reference concentration: 1,500 ppb4 of 4 samples2014–2015
Manganese3 ug/LEPA reference concentration: 300 ppb2 of 2 samples2018–2019
Chromium-6 (hexavalent chromium)0.04 ug/L2x the California public health goal of 0.02 ppb1 of 4 samples2015

Most of the substances above still have no federal limit, so there is no legal line to compare them against and we do not invent one. Where a health goal is shown it is California’s published figure, the level its health agency considers to carry no significant risk over a lifetime. Where it names EPA the figure is EPA’s own. Where it says our benchmark instead, no government body has published anything at all for that substance, and the figure is this site’s, built on the nearest official source and cited on that contaminant’s own page. It is marked so the difference is never hidden. The reading is what was measured, on the date it was measured. Whether anything has changed since is not knowable from public data, because nobody has been required to look.

What was found in the pipes

Jupiter Public Water System,town of took 1,541 bacteria samples from its distribution system in 2023. Five came back positive, one of them E. coli.

E. coli means the water met feces somewhere between the plant and the tap. The health goal for it is zero, and unlike a chemical exceedance it can make you sick the same week.

No health-based bacteria violation was issued to this system for September 2023.

Date sampledFound
April 10, 2023total coliform
September 25, 2023E. coli
November 13, 2023total coliform
November 15, 2023total coliform
November 29, 2023total coliform

From FDEP’s microbiological report, 2023. These are samples taken from the distribution system, the water in the pipes on the way to you, and not untreated source water. A positive sample is normally followed by repeat samples, and where those come back clean no violation is recorded, which is why findings like these do not appear in a compliance history.

How this system treats the water

FDEP records 2 treatment plants for this system, and they are not equipped the same. Only disinfection, iron removal, particle removal, softening and taste and odour happen at both, and not always by the same method. A step recorded at some plants treats some of what this system produces, not all of it.

corrosion controla corrosion inhibitor and pH adjustment, at 1 of 2 plants
desalinationreverse osmosis, at 1 of 2 plants
disinfectionchloramines and gaseous chlorination
iron removalion exchange
particle removalcartridge filtration, rapid sand filtration and reverse osmosis, at 1 of 2 plants
softeningion exchange; reverse osmosis, at 1 of 2 plants
taste and odourion exchange; packed tower aeration, at 1 of 2 plants

From FDEP’s treatment facility report, 2023. It lists what each plant is equipped to do, which is not the same as what any single process removes on a given day, and treatment happens before the water reaches your service line or your own plumbing. FDEP counts plants separately even where they stand on one site and run at the same time, and their output mixes in the distribution system. A count here says how many of this system’s plants include a step, not which homes receive it.

The Solution

01

Get your water tested

We measure what is actually coming out of your taps - hardness, iron, pH, TDS, PFAS, and whatever your own plumbing adds - the things a utility report can never show.

02

See your real results

We walk you through exactly what is there and what it affects: your skin, your pipes, your appliances, and the taste. Measured at your tap, not at the plant.

03

Get recommendations

Based on your results, we recommend the treatment that fits your water - a softener, reverse osmosis, or whole-home filtration - and nothing you do not need.

Know when your water changes

We will email you when new readings, violations or health goals land for your system.

Or schedule a water consultation.

Data Sources

EPA SDWISSystem identity, source, population, ZIP mapping · PWS FL4501491ret. 2026
EPA UCMR 5PFAS measured occurrence (2023–25)ret. 2026
2024 CCRRegulated contaminants - the utility’s own reportret. 2026
FDEPFlorida drinking-water chemical monitoring - additional regulated analytesret. 2026
FDEPMicrobiological monitoring, 2023 - coliform results from distribution system samplesret. 2026
EPA UCMR 3/4Unregulated contaminant monitoring, sampled 2013-15 and 2018-20ret. 2026
CA OEHHACalifornia public health goals, the health-based benchmark where one is publishedret. 2026
FWROur own benchmarks, only where no government body has published one, each citing the official source it is built onret. 2026

These figures describe the water your utility delivers, drawn from public federal and state records - not our own lab samples, and not what your home’s plumbing adds after the water arrives. Informational; not a substitute for testing your own tap.

Get your home’s actual numbersSchedule a consultation