Collier County Regional WTP

Location
Naples, Florida
Serves
171,370
Source
Groundwater
Data
2014-2024

Overview

Collier County Regional WTP is a public drinking-water system serving about 171,370 people in Collier County, Florida.

Lead was detected in this system’s water. EPA states its health effects: in infants and children: delays in physical or mental development; in adults: kidney problems and high blood pressure.

HAA5 (Haloacetic Acids) was detected in this system’s water. EPA states its health effects: may increase the risk of cancer.

TTHM (Total Trihalomethanes) was detected in this system’s water. EPA states its health effects: may increase the risk of cancer; liver, kidney, or central nervous system effects.

EPA’s health goal for Lead is zero. There is no amount of it it considers safe to drink.

When EPA last ran its national survey here it found Chromium-6, HAA6Br, HAA9, Strontium, and 3 more. Nobody has been required to look for any of them since.

It serves Naples, Berkshire Lakes, Bonita Springs, Golden Gate, Heritage Bay, Island Walk, and 12 other communities.

It uses groundwater as its source.

Contaminants Detected

Not detected, or not looked for 96

PFAS · EPA UCMR5 monitoring

These were genuinely sampled, because EPA required it. Of 29 PFAS “forever chemicals” tested under the UCMR5 program, 0 were detected (shown above) and 29 were not:

11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFBA, PFBS, PFDA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpA, PFHpS, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFNA, PFOA, PFOS, PFPeA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFUnA

Regulated contaminants · no result on record

Federally regulated contaminants with no reading on record for this system. A missing reading can mean the sample came back clean, or that nobody was required to take one. The published data does not say which, and smaller systems monitor many of these only once every few years:

1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, 1,2-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, 2,4,5-TP (Silvex), 2,4-D, Alachlor, Antimony, Arsenic, Asbestos, Atrazine, Barium, Benzene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Beta particle & photon emitters, Bromate, Cadmium, Carbofuran, Carbon tetrachloride, Chlordane, Chlorite, Chlorobenzene (monochlorobenzene), Combined radium (Ra-226 & Ra-228), Cyanide, Dalapon, Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate, Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Dibromochloropropane (DBCP), Dichloromethane (methylene chloride), Dinoseb, Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD), Diquat, Endothall, Endrin, Ethylbenzene, Ethylene dibromide (EDB), Fluoride, Glyphosate, Gross alpha particle activity, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, Hexachlorobenzene, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, Lindane, Mercury (inorganic), Methoxychlor, Nitrite, Oxamyl (Vydate), Pentachlorophenol, Picloram, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Selenium, Simazine, Styrene, Tetrachloroethylene, Toluene, Toxaphene, Trichloroethylene, Uranium, Vinyl chloride, Xylenes (total), cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene, o-Dichlorobenzene, p-Dichlorobenzene, trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

What a national survey found, years ago

A utility only reports contaminants that have a federal limit. EPA runs a separate national survey to look for the ones that do not, sampling each system a handful of times and then moving on. These are Collier County Regional WTP’s results from those rounds. They are the only public measurements of these substances for this system, and they are between five and twelve years old.

ContaminantHighest readingFound inMeasured
Chromium-6 (hexavalent chromium)0.37 ug/L18.5x the California public health goal of 0.02 ppb8 of 8 samples2014
HAA6Br (brominated haloacetic acids)11.89 ug/L396x the Florida Water Report benchmark of 0.03 ppb8 of 8 samples2018
HAA9 (nine haloacetic acids)26.31 ug/L877x the Florida Water Report benchmark of 0.03 ppb8 of 8 samples2018
Strontium111 ug/LEPA reference concentration: 1,500 ppb8 of 8 samples2014
Vanadium1.7 ug/LEPA reference concentration: 21 ppb4 of 8 samples2014
Chlorate260 ug/LEPA reference concentration: 210 ppb2 of 8 samples2014
Manganese0.45 ug/LEPA reference concentration: 300 ppb2 of 4 samples2018

Most of the substances above still have no federal limit, so there is no legal line to compare them against and we do not invent one. Where a health goal is shown it is California’s published figure, the level its health agency considers to carry no significant risk over a lifetime. Where it names EPA the figure is EPA’s own. Where it says our benchmark instead, no government body has published anything at all for that substance, and the figure is this site’s, built on the nearest official source and cited on that contaminant’s own page. It is marked so the difference is never hidden. The reading is what was measured, on the date it was measured. Whether anything has changed since is not knowable from public data, because nobody has been required to look.

What was found in the pipes

Collier County Regional WTP took 1,794 bacteria samples from its distribution system in 2023. Nine came back positive, two of them E. coli.

E. coli means the water met feces somewhere between the plant and the tap. The health goal for it is zero, and unlike a chemical exceedance it can make you sick the same week.

No health-based bacteria violation was issued to this system for December 2023.

Date sampledFound
April 10, 2023total coliform
June 6, 2023total coliform
July 12, 2023total coliform
October 12, 2023total coliform
October 14, 2023total coliform
December 4, 2023E. coli
December 6, 2023E. coli
December 18, 2023total coliform
December 19, 2023total coliform

From FDEP’s microbiological report, 2023. These are samples taken from the distribution system, the water in the pipes on the way to you, and not untreated source water. A positive sample is normally followed by repeat samples, and where those come back clean no violation is recorded, which is why findings like these do not appear in a compliance history.

How this system treats the water

FDEP records 3 treatment plants for this system, and they are not equipped the same. Only disinfection and other happen at all 3, and not always by the same method. A step recorded at some plants treats some of what this system produces, not all of it.

corrosion controlpH adjustment, at 2 of 3 plants; sequestration, at 1 of 3 plants
desalinationreverse osmosis, at 1 of 3 plants
disinfectionchloramines, at 2 of 3 plants; gaseous chlorination and hypochlorination, at 1 of 3 plants
organics removalnanofiltration, at 1 of 3 plants
otherfluoridation, at 2 of 3 plants; pH adjustment, at 1 of 3 plants
particle removalcoagulation and rapid sand filtration, at 1 of 3 plants
softeninglime softening and nanofiltration, at 1 of 3 plants
taste and odouraeration, at 2 of 3 plants; reverse osmosis, at 1 of 3 plants

From FDEP’s treatment facility report, 2023. It lists what each plant is equipped to do, which is not the same as what any single process removes on a given day, and treatment happens before the water reaches your service line or your own plumbing. FDEP counts plants separately even where they stand on one site and run at the same time, and their output mixes in the distribution system. A count here says how many of this system’s plants include a step, not which homes receive it.

The Solution

01

Get your water tested

We measure what is actually coming out of your taps - hardness, iron, pH, TDS, PFAS, and whatever your own plumbing adds - the things a utility report can never show.

02

See your real results

We walk you through exactly what is there and what it affects: your skin, your pipes, your appliances, and the taste. Measured at your tap, not at the plant.

03

Get recommendations

Based on your results, we recommend the treatment that fits your water - a softener, reverse osmosis, or whole-home filtration - and nothing you do not need.

Know when your water changes

We will email you when new readings, violations or health goals land for your system.

Or schedule a water consultation.

Data Sources

EPA SDWISSystem identity, source, population, ZIP mapping · PWS FL5114069ret. 2026
EPA UCMR 5PFAS measured occurrence (2023–25)ret. 2026
2024 CCRRegulated contaminants - the utility’s own reportret. 2026
FDEPFlorida drinking-water chemical monitoring - additional regulated analytesret. 2026
FDEPMicrobiological monitoring, 2023 - coliform results from distribution system samplesret. 2026
EPA UCMR 3/4Unregulated contaminant monitoring, sampled 2013-15 and 2018-20ret. 2026
CA OEHHACalifornia public health goals, the health-based benchmark where one is publishedret. 2026
FWROur own benchmarks, only where no government body has published one, each citing the official source it is built onret. 2026

These figures describe the water your utility delivers, drawn from public federal and state records - not our own lab samples, and not what your home’s plumbing adds after the water arrives. Informational; not a substitute for testing your own tap.

Get your home’s actual numbersSchedule a consultation